Immigration Lawyers in Melbourne
immigration lawyers in melbourne

What do you need to know about PIC 4007 health waiver?

Section 57 of the Migration Act 1958 (‘the Act’) requires the Department of Home Affairs to provide you with an opportunity to comment and present information if the Department is considering refusing your visa application.

Section 57 is founded in the principle that individuals have the right to a fair and unbiased hearing when they are involved in legal proceedings or administrative decisions that may have an impact on their rights or interests. The principles of natural justice require that decision-makers act impartially, give the parties involved an opportunity to be heard and provide reasons for their decisions.

One area where natural justice is particularly important is in the context of health waiver cases. Health waivers are issued by the Australian government to allow individuals with certain medical conditions to enter or remain in the country, even if they do not meet the standard health requirements for immigration. These waivers are often granted in cases where an individual’s condition is deemed not to pose a significant risk to public health or safety.

However, the process for obtaining a health waiver can be complex and confusing, and there have been cases where the principles of natural justice have not been fully upheld. For example, in one case a woman with diabetes was denied a health waiver by the Department of Home Affairs, despite medical evidence that her condition was well-controlled and did not pose a risk to public health. The decision was made without giving the woman an opportunity to provide additional evidence or explain her circumstances.

In response, the woman sought a review of the decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, arguing that she had not been given a fair hearing. The Tribunal agreed and found that the decision to refuse the health waiver had been made without giving the woman adequate notice or opportunity to be heard. As a result, the decision was set aside and the case was sent back to the Department for reconsideration.

This case highlights the importance of natural justice in health waiver cases, and the need for decision-makers to be impartial and give all parties involved a fair hearing. It also illustrates the benefits of having an independent body like the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to review decisions and ensure that the principles of natural justice are upheld.

In conclusion, natural justice is a fundamental principle of the Australian legal system and is particularly important in cases where individuals’ rights and interests are at stake. The health waiver process is one area where natural justice is particularly relevant, and recent cases have highlighted the need for decision-makers to act impartially and ensure that all parties are given a fair hearing. By upholding the principles of natural justice, the Australian government can ensure that decisions are made fairly and impartially, and that all individuals are given the opportunity to have their voices heard.

Are you or someone you know affected by PIC 4007?

Contact the top immigration lawyers in Melbourne on +61 3 9670 3663 or book your free consult today and we will guide you.

Let’s Talk!

Spread the word!

Katsaros & Associates © 2022 - . Dolopia Group Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reprinting or digital redistribution to the public is prohibited without the consent of Katsaros & Associates.